Go Back   USB JTAG > General > Script Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2014, 10:50 PM
ricktendo ricktendo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 137
Default Optimized usbjtag.inf for Windows 6.x

The following is an optimized INF for use with Windows 6.x (Vista and above.) There is no need for the CoInstallers unless you are working on Windows 2000/XP (even so it may be a good idea to update the older driver from 01007 to 01009 CoInstallers)

Anyway here is the optimized INF (no other files needed)

Signature = "$Windows NT$"
Class = USB
Provider = %ProviderName%

; ========== Manufacturer/Models sections ===========

%ProviderName% = MyDevice_WinUSB,NTx86.6.0,NTamd64.6.0

%USB\MyDevice.DeviceDescNT% =USB_Install, USB\Vid_04B4&Pid_8613
%USB\MyDevice.DeviceDesc% =USB_Install, USB\Vid_0547&Pid_2131

%USB\MyDevice.DeviceDescNT% =USB_Install, USB\Vid_04B4&Pid_8613
%USB\MyDevice.DeviceDesc% =USB_Install, USB\Vid_0547&Pid_2131

; =================== Installation ===================





; =================== Strings ===================

BTW I have a self signed version of this INF that gets around the problem on Windows 8+ with unsigned drivers, I could provide it and I could also show you how you can make your own (just let me know if anybody is interested)
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2014, 10:12 AM
usbbdm usbbdm is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,488

I have solved sign issue by using CyUSB. This works for Windows 8 and Windows 10. Can you take a look of it? I still like WinUSB better if I am using Windows 7 and under.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2014, 11:18 PM
ricktendo ricktendo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 137

WinUSB is already a part of Windows (since Vista) and the only thing these two CoInstallers are used for is to add them to operating systems that dont have WinUSB (like XP, 2000)


Open them up in a resource editor or 7zip and you will see all they are is a way to deliver a hotfix into XP, these are installing WinUSB ported from Vista RTM for XP (does nothing on Vista/7/8*)

01007 = WinUSB from Vista porting to XP
01009 = WinUSB from Windows 7 RTM porting to Vista and XP
01011 = WinUSB from Windows 8.0 RTM porting to 7 and Vista (XP support dropped)

The only reason to keep the CoInstallers is for XP support, and updating them to 01009 best... Other than that all you need is this INF, any of the listed CoInstallers is useless in Windows 7 since the WinUSB version has already been updated to the 8.1 WinUSB via Windows Update

Last edited by ricktendo; 12-23-2014 at 11:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2020, 02:38 PM
thegato thegato is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2
Default Technicolor CGA4233 Cable modem

The modem has a serial port and what appears to be a jtag.
How can i try it?

Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2020, 04:42 AM
geant90 geant90 is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 28
Default SB6183 Dump without desolder

Long time folks! Anyone figured a way to dump the SB6183 without desoldering?
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2020, 08:08 AM
Killswitch Killswitch is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 440
Default Restoring DCT3416 back to life

Welcome to all past/present Cable Box Testers ! I pulled one of my fave boxes out of closet, a first generation HDMI w/ 160 GB Hard Drive and found that it had gone into Hunt mode and lost its identity. And, now that a new Firmware has been introduced, it lost its NVRAM and, this is where the Testing begins. This unit uses the EJTAG64 platform and the DCT6412 dll which is identical. After attaching a 10 pin Header onto the board, even an old head like me has been unable to start Testing. All I need do is to copy a valid 3416 NVRAM back on board and, I've found this to be exceptionally difficult to accomplish, just like it was several years ago. It will not Detect the Intel Flash on board, supplying values like 0000000 or FFFFFFF. And, DEBUG ON appears but, setting the NVRAM moves forward only one block on the progress scale and runs no faster than 20 Kbs and quickly hangs due to Watchdog. This box was always difficult back in the day and, remains so today. I DO want to revive this unit and, use it to record stuff. The Watchdog shouldn't matter with a 256 Kb NVRAM. I'm stuck and a bit angry. Are there any creative ideas I can use to speed the Testing process ? Thanx and, a goodday to one and all.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.